[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYx1mDJo/L79cKOH@google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:44:56 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@...wei.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 11/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor shadow_zero_check out of
make_spte
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> These are all related to guest context:
> int (*page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault);
> void (*inject_page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct x86_exception *fault);
That's incorrect, page_fault() and inject_page_fault() could be per-VM. Neither
is particularly interesting though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists