[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0525571e-9950-b953-f6df-e6a81f5c54cc@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:26:06 -0800
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH apparmor] apparmor: remove unneeded one-line hook wrappers
On 10/11/21 7:38 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Use the common function directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
sorry, it looks like I forgot to reply to this. I pulled this into the
apparmor tree and it has been merged for 5.16
> ---
> security/apparmor/lsm.c | 20 ++------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> index f72406fe1bf2..eafb44aa553a 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> @@ -1773,32 +1773,16 @@ static unsigned int apparmor_ip_postroute(void *priv,
>
> }
>
> -static unsigned int apparmor_ipv4_postroute(void *priv,
> - struct sk_buff *skb,
> - const struct nf_hook_state *state)
> -{
> - return apparmor_ip_postroute(priv, skb, state);
> -}
> -
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> -static unsigned int apparmor_ipv6_postroute(void *priv,
> - struct sk_buff *skb,
> - const struct nf_hook_state *state)
> -{
> - return apparmor_ip_postroute(priv, skb, state);
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> static const struct nf_hook_ops apparmor_nf_ops[] = {
> {
> - .hook = apparmor_ipv4_postroute,
> + .hook = apparmor_ip_postroute,
> .pf = NFPROTO_IPV4,
> .hooknum = NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
> .priority = NF_IP_PRI_SELINUX_FIRST,
> },
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> {
> - .hook = apparmor_ipv6_postroute,
> + .hook = apparmor_ip_postroute,
> .pf = NFPROTO_IPV6,
> .hooknum = NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
> .priority = NF_IP6_PRI_SELINUX_FIRST,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists