lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:09:57 -0800
From:   Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Nuke PAGE_KERNEL_IO

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 08:04:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:15:09AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> Last user of PAGE_KERNEL_IO is the i915 driver. While removing it from
>> there as we seek to bring the driver to other architectures, Daniel
>> suggested that we could finish the cleanup and remove it altogether,
>> through the tip tree. So here I'm sending both commits needed for that.
>>
>> Lucas De Marchi (2):
>>   drm/i915/gem: stop using PAGE_KERNEL_IO
>>   x86/mm: nuke PAGE_KERNEL_IO
>>
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/fixmap.h             | 2 +-
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h      | 7 -------
>>  arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c                     | 2 +-
>>  arch/x86/xen/setup.c                      | 2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 4 ++--
>>  include/asm-generic/fixmap.h              | 2 +-
>>  6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
>Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

thanks, Peter.

The intention was to merge this through the tip tree. Although now I'm
not sure. Options:

	1) take the first patch through the drm-intel tree and apply the
	   second patch later
	2) take everything through the drm tree
	3) take everything through the tip tree

What's your preference here?

Lucas De Marchi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ