linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Nuke PAGE_KERNEL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ad5de1d-1cd3-b1cd-2880-c8df78e4db58@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:18:18 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Nuke PAGE_KERNEL_IO

On 11/12/21 12:09 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> The intention was to merge this through the tip tree. Although now I'm
> not sure. Options:
> 
>     1) take the first patch through the drm-intel tree and apply the
>        second patch later
>     2) take everything through the drm tree
>     3) take everything through the tip tree
> 
> What's your preference here?

It's fine with me to take it through tip unless that causes a problem
for anyone.  I was planning on doing queuing it after -rc1.