[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZJAmCsnD2QRNoCs@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:12:24 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: buffer: allocation and freeing buffers fix
and optimization
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 03:26:11PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:49:21 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Yang submitted a fix, but I think the code can be refactored a bit to be more
> > robust against similar mistakes in the future, if any.
> >
> > In v2:
> > - put SoB Yang's patch (it's good for backporting)
> > - added refactoring patch on top of Yang's fix
> >
> > Andy Shevchenko (1):
> > iio: buffer: Use dedicated variable in
> > iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask()
> >
> > Yang Yingliang (1):
> > iio: buffer: Fix double-free in iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask()
> >
> > drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 18 +++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> 1st patch applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git. I may well end up
> sending these in the merge window anyway in which case I'll probably stick patch 2
> on top of it before sending. If not I'll pick that up next cycle now.
Is it a right time now?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists