linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: buffer: allocation and freeing buffers fix and optimization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 20 Nov 2021 14:17:50 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: buffer: allocation and freeing buffers fix
 and optimization

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:12:24 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 03:26:11PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:49:21 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Yang submitted a fix, but I think the code can be refactored a bit to be more
> > > robust against similar mistakes in the future, if any.
> > > 
> > > In v2:
> > > - put SoB Yang's patch (it's good for backporting)
> > > - added refactoring patch on top of Yang's fix
> > > 
> > > Andy Shevchenko (1):
> > >   iio: buffer: Use dedicated variable in
> > >     iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask()
> > > 
> > > Yang Yingliang (1):
> > >   iio: buffer: Fix double-free in iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask()
> > > 
> > >  drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 18 +++++++-----------
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >   
> > 1st patch applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git. I may well end up
> > sending these in the merge window anyway in which case I'll probably stick patch 2
> > on top of it before sending.  If not I'll pick that up next cycle now.  
> 
> Is it a right time now?
> 
Applied, but needed a bit of hand tweaking as patches have crossed with this.

Pushed out as testing for 0-day to see if we missed anything.

Thanks,

Jonathan