[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34b23c4f-65b0-4c01-4148-d536732b3aeb@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 20:01:59 +0800
From: Wu Bo <wubo40@...wei.com>
To: brookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <hch@...radead.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: core: use eh_timeout to timeout start_unit
command
On 2021/11/10 9:23, brookxu wrote:
> From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@...cent.com>
>
> In some abnormal scenarios, STU may timeout. The recovery
> time of 30 seconds is relatively large. Now we need to modify
> rq_timeout to adjust STU timeout value, but it will affect the
> actual IO.
>
> commit 9728c0814ecb ("[SCSI] make scsi_eh_try_stu use block
> timeout") use rq_timeout to timeout the STU command, but after
> commit 0816c9251a71 ("[SCSI] Allow error handling timeout to
> be specified") eh_timeout will init to SCSI_DEFAULT_EH_TIMEOUT,
> so it is more reasonable to use eh_timeout as the timeout value
> of STU command. In this way, we can uniformly control recovery
> time through eh_timeout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@...cent.com>
> ---
> v2: Update commit log and fix some format issues.
>
> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index a531336..a665318 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -1404,7 +1404,8 @@ static int scsi_eh_try_stu(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> enum scsi_disposition rtn = NEEDS_RETRY;
>
> for (i = 0; rtn == NEEDS_RETRY && i < 2; i++)
> - rtn = scsi_send_eh_cmnd(scmd, stu_command, 6, scmd->device->request_queue->rq_timeout, 0);
> + rtn = scsi_send_eh_cmnd(scmd, stu_command, 6,
> + scmd->device->eh_timeout, 0);
>
> if (rtn == SUCCESS)
> return 0;
>
Reviewed-by: Wu Bo <wubo40@...wei.com>
--
Wu Bo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists