[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a241g2vQrfiEf_YcQ0=t5fhN0R0CrzQE5DK7XQgAGxKYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:02:18 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Meng Li <Meng.Li@...driver.com>
Cc: thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: altera-sysmgr: enable raw spinlock feature for
preempt-rt kernel
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:54 AM Meng Li <Meng.Li@...driver.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/altera-sysmgr.c b/drivers/mfd/altera-sysmgr.c
> index 5d3715a28b28..27271cec5d53 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/altera-sysmgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/altera-sysmgr.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ static struct regmap_config altr_sysmgr_regmap_cfg = {
> .fast_io = true,
> .use_single_read = true,
> .use_single_write = true,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> + .use_raw_spinlock = true,
> +#endif
I think you should remove the #ifdef here: if PREEMPT_RT is disabled, the flag
has no effect because spinlock behaves the same way as raw_spinlock. If
anything else starts requiring the use of raw spinlocks, then we probably
want the flag to be set here as well.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists