[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZPhP6C6WgJ211oq@debian>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:50:07 +0000
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/355] 5.4.160-rc1 review
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 05:58:44PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.160 release.
> There are 355 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:52:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 65 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 107 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/391
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists