lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU74ih7Sk7tWmvMy9OsyO2=f0cO7fUoBREKnFQSKf+zyig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:30:37 +0100
From:   Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 063/355] powerpc/kvm: Fix kvm_use_magic_page

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 3:15 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 03:00:19PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 2:57 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:54:10PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 1:54 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 06:47:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > > > >Greg,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:10 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > > > ><gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > >> From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> commit 0c8eb2884a42d992c7726539328b7d3568f22143 upstream.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> When switching from __get_user to fault_in_pages_readable, commit
> > > > > >> 9f9eae5ce717 broke kvm_use_magic_page: like __get_user,
> > > > > >> fault_in_pages_readable returns 0 on success.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I've not heard back from the maintainers about this patch so far, so
> > > > > >it would probably be safer to leave it out of stable for now.
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you mean exactly? It's upstream.
> > > >
> > > > Mathieu Malaterre broke this test in 2018 (commit 9f9eae5ce717) but
> > > > that wasn't noticed until now (commit 0c8eb2884a42). This means that
> > > > this fix probably isn't critical, so I shouldn't be backported.
> > >
> > > Then why did you tag it to be explicitly backported to all stable
> > > kernels newer than 4.18?
> >
> > Well, sorry for that. What else do you expect me to do in addition to
> > pointing out the mistake?
>
> Ah, I think we are misunderstanding each other here.  I will go drop it,
> but in the future maybe "hey, I didn't mean to mark this for stable, can
> you please drop it?" might be a bit more direct and to the point.

Yes, the stable Cc was an accident on my side (caused by a script that
takes a SHA1 and spits out Fixes: and Cc: tags). Sorry and thanks for
dropping the patch.

Andreas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ