[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZVRvHXY9/i0Pht5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:02:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Fix build PARAVIRT_XXL=y without XEN_PV
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:46:30AM -0800, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> TDX has a requirement to use HLT paravirt calls (which is currently
> listed under PARAVIRT_XXL). Once we submit a patch to move it
> under CONFIG_PARAVIRT, we will drop this dependency.
Why do you need to paravirt hlt at all? Can't the TDX thing simply
install a different x86_idle function?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists