[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33ca60945b7945ff08ae295a4d683ebe99e41d46.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 15:06:54 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Anand Ashok Dumbre <ANANDASH@...inx.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, git <git@...inx.com>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for xilinx-ams
On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 21:28 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:46:20AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On 2021-11-17 09:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 6:05 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > What do you think checkpatch is supposed to find?
> >
> > > To me AMS should precede AXI and not the other way around. Agree?
> >
> > Sure but checkpatch just looks at patches and doesn't inspect the patched
> > file, apply the patch then look at the result. The patch itself looks fine.
>
> I see, checkpatch simply doesn't have such functionality and maintainers should
> ask people to rung parse-maintainers.pl from time to timeā¦
I asked Linus to do that before every -rc1 and he demurred.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjq68jF+fcSJYpRT3yS+=oOxaEFtYVmSjKb0RLbo7+JWw@mail.gmail.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists