[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211118181125.3918222-1-dqiao@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:11:25 -0500
From: Donghai Qiao <dqiao@...hat.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mhocko@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, guro@...com,
dqiao@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH] mm/page_counter: remove an incorrect call to propagate_protected_usage()
The function propagate_protected_usage() is called to propagate the usage
change in the page_counter structure. But there is call to this function
from page_counter_try_charge() when there is actually no usage change.
Hence this call should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Donghai Qiao <dqiao@...hat.com>
---
mm/page_counter.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_counter.c b/mm/page_counter.c
index 7d83641eb86b..eb156ff5d603 100644
--- a/mm/page_counter.c
+++ b/mm/page_counter.c
@@ -120,7 +120,6 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page_counter *counter,
new = atomic_long_add_return(nr_pages, &c->usage);
if (new > c->max) {
atomic_long_sub(nr_pages, &c->usage);
- propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
/*
* This is racy, but we can live with some
* inaccuracy in the failcnt which is only used
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists