linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] clk: qcom: Add SDX65 GCC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YZXfvkZ0H+CeBfuQ@matsya>
Date:   Thu, 18 Nov 2021 10:38:14 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@...cinc.com>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, maz@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] clk: qcom: Add SDX65 GCC support

On 17-11-21, 21:04, Vamsi Krishna Lanka wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:09:46AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 17-11-21, 17:51, Vamsi Krishna Lanka wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:03:02PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > On 15-11-21, 23:38, quic_vamslank@...cinc.com wrote:
> > > > > From: Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@...cinc.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Add Global Clock Controller (GCC) support for SDX65 SoCs from Qualcomm.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@...cinc.com>
> > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Missing support reported ??
> > > 
> > > Not mising support but it reported to delete unused varaibles and after
> > > the fix mentioned to add the reported tag.
> > 
> > I think it does not make sense here, you may add a note in changelog
> > that you fixed issues reported by kbot
> 
> I mentioned that in the cover letter and thought that is sufficient.

Yes that should be.

-- 
~Vinod