linux-kernel - [PATCH] loop: check loop_control_ioctl parameter in range of minor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211119022406.20803-1-yangbonis@icloud.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:24:07 +0800
From:   wangyangbo <yangbonis@...oud.com>
To:     axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:     penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wangyangbo <yangbonis@...oud.com>
Subject: [PATCH] loop: check loop_control_ioctl parameter in range of minor

loop_control_ioctl call add_disk of block layer, but may pass number beyond MAX MINOR.
So check loop_control_ioctl parameter in range of minor, and delete redundant code.

Reproduce:
touch file
losetup /dev/loop1048576 file
losetup /dev/loop0 file

Problem:
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/dev/block/7:0'
CPU: 0 PID: 529 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.16-arch1-1 #1 ad87b876fa2ab6fdbd995dc1c9aab0ad8f767b2c
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x46/0x5a
 sysfs_warn_dup.cold+0x17/0x24
 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0xbe/0xd0
 device_add+0x580/0x970
 ? dev_set_name+0x5b/0x80
 __device_add_disk+0xb5/0x2f0
 loop_add+0x236/0x290 [loop 2ed923fc8fbd84fdc093bf55ac085973636a3936]
 loop_control_ioctl+0x7f/0x1f0 [loop 2ed923fc8fbd84fdc093bf55ac085973636a3936]
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0
 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x80
 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x23/0x40
 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7ff3e8ba259b
Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c 89 e0 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d a5 a8 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffe6d2eaa18 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe6d2eb038 RCX: 00007ff3e8ba259b
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000004c80 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007ffe6d2eaae0 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 00007ffe6d2eaa24 R14: 0000560b131bd200 R15: 0000560b131c44a0
---
 drivers/block/loop.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index a154cab6cd98..3b19ffaa63e9 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -2102,11 +2102,6 @@ static int loop_control_remove(int idx)
 	struct loop_device *lo;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (idx < 0) {
-		pr_warn("deleting an unspecified loop device is not supported.\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-		
 	/* Hide this loop device for serialization. */
 	ret = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 	if (ret)
@@ -2145,7 +2140,7 @@ static int loop_control_remove(int idx)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int loop_control_get_free(int idx)
+static int loop_control_get_free(void)
 {
 	struct loop_device *lo;
 	int id, ret;
@@ -2168,13 +2163,16 @@ static int loop_control_get_free(int idx)
 static long loop_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
 			       unsigned long parm)
 {
+	if (parm > MINORMASK)
+		pr_warn("ioctl parameter is out of max_minor.\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case LOOP_CTL_ADD:
 		return loop_add(parm);
 	case LOOP_CTL_REMOVE:
 		return loop_control_remove(parm);
 	case LOOP_CTL_GET_FREE:
-		return loop_control_get_free(parm);
+		return loop_control_get_free();
 	default:
 		return -ENOSYS;
 	}
-- 
2.20.1