[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61970bf5.1c69fb81.6852b.3a87@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 03:28:48 +0100
From: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 16/19] net: dsa: qca8k: enable
mtu_enforcement_ingress
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 04:20:08AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:04:48PM +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> > qca8k have a global MTU. Inform DSA of this as the change MTU port
> > function checks the max MTU across all port and sets the max value
> > anyway as this switch doesn't support per port MTU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/dsa/qca8k.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/qca8k.c b/drivers/net/dsa/qca8k.c
> > index c3234988aabf..cae58753bb1f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/qca8k.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/qca8k.c
> > @@ -1315,6 +1315,9 @@ qca8k_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> > /* Set max number of LAGs supported */
> > ds->num_lag_ids = QCA8K_NUM_LAGS;
> >
> > + /* Global MTU. Inform dsa that per port MTU is not supported */
> > + ds->mtu_enforcement_ingress = true;
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.32.0
> >
>
> This doesn't do what you think it does. If you want the dev->mtu of all
> interfaces to get updated at once, you need to do that yourself. Setting
> ds->mtu_enforcement_ingress will only update the MTU for ports belonging
> to the same bridge, and for a different reason. Or I'm missing the
> reason why you're making this change now.
Got confused by the Documentation. Just to confirm in DSA we don't have
a way to handle the case where we have one MTU reg that is applied to
every port, correct?
We already handle this by checking the max MTU set to all port in the
port_change_mtu but I was searching a cleaner way to handle this as
currently we use an array to store the MTU of all port and seems a bit
hacky and a waste of space.
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists