linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 0/9] arm64: imx8mn: Enable more imx8m Nano functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 21 Nov 2021 11:11:49 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
        Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
        "Ariel D'Alessandro" <ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/9] arm64: imx8mn: Enable more imx8m Nano functions

Hi Adam,

On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 10:07 AM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:

> I cannot replicate your issue.  I applied the patch series to
> 5.16-rc1, and it's still working for me.

Could the different behavior be caused by different TF-A versions that
you and Tim used?

Which ATF version do you use? Is it TF-A v2.5?

Thanks