[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHCN7xLzR5LqqydC7uydsXQPFVn=nyqKD8ZEH3EjcPuwQky5WA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 08:17:11 -0600
From: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
"Ariel D'Alessandro" <ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/9] arm64: imx8mn: Enable more imx8m Nano functions
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 8:12 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 10:07 AM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > I cannot replicate your issue. I applied the patch series to
> > 5.16-rc1, and it's still working for me.
>
> Could the different behavior be caused by different TF-A versions that
> you and Tim used?
>
> Which ATF version do you use? Is it TF-A v2.5?
I am using https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/imx-atf/log/?h=lf_v2.4
Since the driver sending SMCC commands to ATF isn't doing that, I
assume it's safe to use the linux power-domain drivers with the ATF
from NXP's kernel.
If you can point me to the repo you think I should be using, I'll give it a try.
thanks,
adam
>
> Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists