[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1ce8a8e-d8aa-f9e5-27db-fa1455ea00f0@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:00:40 +0100
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc: David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>,
Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: samsung: exynos850: Register clocks early
On 22.11.2021 00:27, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> /* Register Offset definitions for CMU_CORE (0x12000000) */
> @@ -1014,24 +1060,12 @@ static int __init exynos850_cmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> const struct samsung_cmu_info *info;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>
> info = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> - exynos850_init_clocks(np, info->clk_regs, info->nr_clk_regs);
> - samsung_cmu_register_one(np, info);
>
> - /* Keep bus clock running, so it's possible to access CMU registers */
> - if (info->clk_name) {
> - struct clk *bus_clk;
> -
> - bus_clk = clk_get(dev, info->clk_name);
> - if (IS_ERR(bus_clk)) {
> - pr_err("%s: could not find bus clock %s; err = %ld\n",
> - __func__, info->clk_name, PTR_ERR(bus_clk));
> - } else {
> - clk_prepare_enable(bus_clk);
> - }
> - }
> + /* Early clocks are already registered using CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER() */
> + if (info != &peri_cmu_info)
> + exynos850_register_cmu(dev, dev->of_node, info);
>
Do you still need this test? How about just removing "samsung,exynos850-cmu-peri"
from exynos850_cmu_of_match[] ?
--
Regards,
Sylwester
Powered by blists - more mailing lists