linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for-rc] RDMA/cma: Remove open coding for overflow in cma_connect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A4CB35B-C9BB-4511-A792-BCB1790E42FF@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:01:54 +0000
From:   Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-rc] RDMA/cma: Remove open coding for overflow in
 cma_connect_ib



> On 23 Nov 2021, at 10:50, Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 23 Nov 2021, at 10:11, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:48:53PM +0100, Håkon Bugge wrote:
>>> The existing test is a little hard to comprehend. Use
>>> check_add_overflow() instead.
>>> 
>>> Fixes: 04ded1672402 ("RDMA/cma: Verify private data length")
>>> Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 3 +--
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>>> index 835ac54..0435768 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>>> @@ -4093,8 +4093,7 @@ static int cma_connect_ib(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv,
>>> 
>>> 	memset(&req, 0, sizeof req);
>>> 	offset = cma_user_data_offset(id_priv);
>>> -	req.private_data_len = offset + conn_param->private_data_len;
>>> -	if (req.private_data_len < conn_param->private_data_len)
>>> +	if (check_add_overflow(offset, conn_param->private_data_len, &req.private_data_len))
>>> 		return -EINVAL;
>> 
>> The same check exists in cma_resolve_ib_udp too.
> 
> Thanks for pointing it out Leon. Will send a v2.

Be aware, will change $Subject slightly.


Håkon

> 
> 
> Thxs, Håkon
> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>>> 
>>> 	if (req.private_data_len) {
>>> -- 
>>> 1.8.3.1