[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKkUxTYuUp3BjzF-hChEpmRrWB0Ai-xgqdHHvXiD_5b7-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:24:24 +0100
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: Revisiting XFD-based AMX and heterogenous systems
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 1:22 AM Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> Sure, but I bet the demand will be there. The desktop gamer types will flip off E cores and flip on AVX512 and call it a day. But the ones who want battery life will be annoyed, and I bet someone at Intel is contemplating how to switch it at runtime.
The premise of this thread is erroneous.
See Arjan's response.
--
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists