[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211123142801.182530-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:28:01 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing/uprobe: Fix uprobe_perf_open probes iteration
Add missing 'tu' variable initialization in the probes loop,
otherwise the head 'tu' is used instead of added probes.
Fixes: 99c9a923e97a ("tracing/uprobe: Fix double perf_event linking on multiprobe uprobe")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 0a5c0db3137e..f5f0039d31e5 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -1313,6 +1313,7 @@ static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_event_call *call,
return 0;
list_for_each_entry(pos, trace_probe_probe_list(tp), list) {
+ tu = container_of(pos, struct trace_uprobe, tp);
err = uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, true);
if (err) {
uprobe_perf_close(call, event);
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists