[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5129f02d-7c0e-8e88-797f-95e8d968df88@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:42:51 +0100
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.5 00/30] KVM: Scalable memslots implementation
Paolo,
I see that you have merged the whole series to kvm/queue, even though it
still needed some changes and, most importantly, a good round of testing.
Does this mean you want all these changes as a separate patch set on top
of the already-merged series?
Thanks,
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists