linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5.5 00/30] KVM: Scalable memslots implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <086c9553-6ba1-411b-43db-b51670798938@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:33:39 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.5 00/30] KVM: Scalable memslots implementation

On 11/23/21 15:42, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> Paolo,
> 
> I see that you have merged the whole series to kvm/queue, even though it
> still needed some changes and, most importantly, a good round of testing.
> 
> Does this mean you want all these changes as a separate patch set on top
> of the already-merged series?

Hi Maciej,

you can squash your changes and post a v6.

Paolo