[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e95f682b-a9b4-d946-c6fc-e59aba624466@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 18:00:23 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, joro@...tes.org,
will@...nel.org
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, willy@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] iommu: Move flush queue data into iommu_dma_cookie
On 2021-11-24 17:25, John Garry wrote:
> On 23/11/2021 14:10, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> ruct iommu_dma_msi_page {
>> struct list_head list;
>> @@ -41,7 +43,19 @@ struct iommu_dma_cookie {
>> enum iommu_dma_cookie_type type;
>> union {
>> /* Full allocator for IOMMU_DMA_IOVA_COOKIE */
>> - struct iova_domain iovad;
>> + struct {
>> + struct iova_domain iovad;
>> +
>> + struct iova_fq __percpu *fq; /* Flush queue */
>> + /* Number of TLB flushes that have been started */
>> + atomic64_t fq_flush_start_cnt;
>> + /* Number of TLB flushes that have been finished */
>> + atomic64_t fq_flush_finish_cnt;
>> + /* Timer to regularily empty the flush queues */
>> + struct timer_list fq_timer;
>> + /* 1 when timer is active, 0 when not */
>> + atomic_t fq_timer_on;
>
> I thought that putting all the FQ stuff in its own structure would be
> neater, but that's just personal preference.
But look, it is! ;)
The iova_domain is still a fundamental part of the flush queue built
around it; the rest of the machinery can't stand in isolation. It's just
an anonymous structure because I don't feel like needlessly cluttering
up the code with "cookie->fq.fq" silliness.
Cheers,
Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists