linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-i2c: Fix buffer handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YZ8rxHDPo68AT4HN@kunai>
Date:   Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:24:18 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
        jie.deng@...el.com, conghui.chen@...el.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-i2c: Fix buffer handling


> Wolfram, you can apply that one as well, it looks okay.

Is it? I read that the code only waits for the last request while
Michael suggested to wait for all of them? And he did not ack patch 2
while he acked patch 1. Did I misunderstand?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)