linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-i2c: Fix buffer handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211125064750.ywq3vd76uy2levoz@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:17:50 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
        jie.deng@...el.com, conghui.chen@...el.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-i2c: Fix buffer handling

On 25-11-21, 07:24, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > Wolfram, you can apply that one as well, it looks okay.
> 
> Is it? I read that the code only waits for the last request while
> Michael suggested to wait for all of them? And he did not ack patch 2
> while he acked patch 1. Did I misunderstand?

Okay, I misread it then.

To clarify, we should initialize the completion for each buffer and
wait for all of them to be completed before returning back to the
user.

Lets wait for an update by Vincent for that then.

-- 
viresh