[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65848fd0-0b37-dde6-fa5a-259c07b69f34@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:30:19 +0100
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 05/14] rtla/osnoise: Add the hist mode
On 11/25/21 15:20, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:45:30 +0100
> Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>>> Or do you think that 1d should be the default, and we have:
>>>
>>> tracefs_hist_alloc() -- 1d histogram
>>> tracefs_hist_alloc_2d() -- 2d histogram
>>> tracefs_hist_alloc_nd() -- Nd histogram?
>>>
>>> ??
>>
>> IMHO, the function names in your second email sound more intuitive, i.e.,
>> tracefs_hist_alloc()/tracefs_hist_alloc_2d()/tracefs_hist_alloc_nd().
>>
>>> We haven't tagged it yet, so we could change it again (and then your code
>>> will work as is).
>>
>> two birds with a single stone :-)
>
> Just to confirm (confused by "second email" above), you prefer that we
> update the API to:
>
> tracefs_hist_alloc()
> tracefs_hist_alloc_2d()
> tracefs_hist_alloc_nd()
>
> Right?
Right!
-- Daniel
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists