[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211125092018.17e36369@oasis.local.home>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 09:20:18 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 05/14] rtla/osnoise: Add the hist mode
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:45:30 +0100
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Or do you think that 1d should be the default, and we have:
> >
> > tracefs_hist_alloc() -- 1d histogram
> > tracefs_hist_alloc_2d() -- 2d histogram
> > tracefs_hist_alloc_nd() -- Nd histogram?
> >
> > ??
>
> IMHO, the function names in your second email sound more intuitive, i.e.,
> tracefs_hist_alloc()/tracefs_hist_alloc_2d()/tracefs_hist_alloc_nd().
>
> > We haven't tagged it yet, so we could change it again (and then your code
> > will work as is).
>
> two birds with a single stone :-)
Just to confirm (confused by "second email" above), you prefer that we
update the API to:
tracefs_hist_alloc()
tracefs_hist_alloc_2d()
tracefs_hist_alloc_nd()
Right?
Thanks,
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists