[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGNP_+VoB=_c5f6LO_NQBfWLrLa=APR2Ajk+kt0XGWqCMp9EXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:41:21 +0100
From: Joel Colledge <joel.colledge@...bit.com>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH] docs: admin-guide/blockdev: Use subgraphs in node-states-8.dot
Thanks for catching this, Akira.
Unfortunately, this fix causes the "node_states" and "peer_states"
graphs to be mixed up. I guess this happens because the same IDs are
used in each subgraph. The graphs should be separate.
On reflection, the digraph node_states can be removed entirely. It is
too basic to contain any useful information. In addition it references
"ioctl_set_state". The ioctl configuration interface for DRBD has long
been removed. In fact, it was never in the upstream version of DRBD.
Best regards,
Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists