linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] SPI: Add SPI driver for Sunplus SP7021

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:03:25 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Lh Kuo 郭力豪 <lh.Kuo@...plus.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "LH.Kuo" <lhjeff911@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dvorkin@...bo.com" <dvorkin@...bo.com>,
        "qinjian@...lus1.com" <qinjian@...lus1.com>,
        Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] SPI: Add SPI driver for Sunplus SP7021

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:36:29AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:

> > 	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);

> I'm not sure if the SPI framework requires the spi_controller to be
> unregistered before hardware is powered off, maybe it is enough to call
> spi_controller_suspend() in the right place?

It would *probably* do the right thing but the expectation really is
that you'll unregister before making the controller stop working, that
should be much more robust..

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)