[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78775967-03dc-8d0a-a994-e07ce673b765@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:13:32 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/vmalloc: alloc GFP_NO{FS,IO} for vmalloc
On 11/22/21 16:32, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
> vmalloc historically hasn't supported GFP_NO{FS,IO} requests because
> page table allocations do not support externally provided gfp mask
> and performed GFP_KERNEL like allocations.
>
> Since few years we have scope (memalloc_no{fs,io}_{save,restore}) APIs
> to enforce NOFS and NOIO constrains implicitly to all allocators within
> the scope. There was a hope that those scopes would be defined on a
> higher level when the reclaim recursion boundary starts/stops (e.g. when
> a lock required during the memory reclaim is required etc.). It seems
> that not all NOFS/NOIO users have adopted this approach and instead
> they have taken a workaround approach to wrap a single [k]vmalloc
> allocation by a scope API.
>
> These workarounds do not serve the purpose of a better reclaim recursion
> documentation and reduction of explicit GFP_NO{FS,IO} usege so let's
> just provide them with the semantic they are asking for without a need
> for workarounds.
>
> Add support for GFP_NOFS and GFP_NOIO to vmalloc directly. All internal
> allocations already comply with the given gfp_mask. The only current
> exception is vmap_pages_range which maps kernel page tables. Infer the
> proper scope API based on the given gfp mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index d2a00ad4e1dd..17ca7001de1f 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2926,6 +2926,8 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> unsigned long array_size;
> unsigned int nr_small_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned int page_order;
> + unsigned int flags;
> + int ret;
>
> array_size = (unsigned long)nr_small_pages * sizeof(struct page *);
> gfp_mask |= __GFP_NOWARN;
> @@ -2967,8 +2969,24 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> goto fail;
> }
>
> - if (vmap_pages_range(addr, addr + size, prot, area->pages,
> - page_shift) < 0) {
> + /*
> + * page tables allocations ignore external gfp mask, enforce it
> + * by the scope API
> + */
> + if ((gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS | __GFP_IO)) == __GFP_IO)
> + flags = memalloc_nofs_save();
> + else if ((gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS | __GFP_IO)) == 0)
> + flags = memalloc_noio_save();
> +
> + ret = vmap_pages_range(addr, addr + size, prot, area->pages,
> + page_shift);
> +
> + if ((gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS | __GFP_IO)) == __GFP_IO)
> + memalloc_nofs_restore(flags);
> + else if ((gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS | __GFP_IO)) == 0)
> + memalloc_noio_restore(flags);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> warn_alloc(orig_gfp_mask, NULL,
> "vmalloc error: size %lu, failed to map pages",
> area->nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists