[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17d5c5d9498.134e725b210976.7805957202314611987@mykernel.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 21:09:36 +0800
From: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net>
To: "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: "miklos" <miklos@...redi.hu>, "amir73il" <amir73il@...il.com>,
"linux-unionfs" <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chengguang Xu" <charliecgxu@...cent.com>,
"ronyjin" <ronyjin@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V6 3/7] ovl: implement overlayfs' own ->write_inode
operation
---- 在 星期五, 2021-11-26 17:14:30 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> 撰写 ----
> On Mon 22-11-21 11:00:34, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> > From: Chengguang Xu <charliecgxu@...cent.com>
> >
> > Sync dirty data and meta of upper inode in overlayfs' ->write_inode()
> > and redirty overlayfs' inode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <charliecgxu@...cent.com>
>
> Looks good. I'm still not 100% convinced keeping inodes dirty all the time
> will not fire back in excessive writeback activity (e.g. flush worker will
> traverse the list of all dirty inodes every 30 seconds and try to write
> them) but I guess we can start with this and if people complain, dirtiness
> handling can be improved.
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the review and suggestion.
Thanks,
Chengguang
> So feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>
> Honza
>
> > ---
> > fs/overlayfs/super.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > index 18a12088a37b..12acf0ec7395 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> > #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > #include <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h>
> > #include <linux/exportfs.h>
> > +#include <linux/writeback.h>
> > #include "overlayfs.h"
> >
> > MODULE_AUTHOR("Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>");
> > @@ -406,12 +407,32 @@ static int ovl_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int ovl_write_inode(struct inode *inode,
> > + struct writeback_control *wbc)
> > +{
> > + struct ovl_fs *ofs = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
> > + struct inode *upper_inode = ovl_inode_upper(inode);
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!upper_inode)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (!ovl_should_sync(ofs))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + ret = write_inode_now(upper_inode, wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL);
> > + mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct super_operations ovl_super_operations = {
> > .alloc_inode = ovl_alloc_inode,
> > .free_inode = ovl_free_inode,
> > .destroy_inode = ovl_destroy_inode,
> > .drop_inode = generic_delete_inode,
> > .put_super = ovl_put_super,
> > + .write_inode = ovl_write_inode,
> > .sync_fs = ovl_sync_fs,
> > .statfs = ovl_statfs,
> > .show_options = ovl_show_options,
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
> >
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists