[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be1624fe-f1e5-f008-32e8-af00a36e284c@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 21:31:47 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Manish Rangankar <mrangankar@...vell.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream <GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"open list:QLOGIC QL41xxx ISCSI DRIVER" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH 1/2] scsi: qedi: Remove set but unused 'page'
variable
On 11/26/2021 12:52 AM, Manish Rangankar wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 10:45 AM
>> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>; kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>;
>> Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>; Manish Rangankar
>> <mrangankar@...vell.com>; GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream <GR-QLogic-
>> Storage-Upstream@...vell.com>; James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>;
>> Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>; open list:QLOGIC QL41xxx
>> ISCSI DRIVER <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
>> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH 1/2] scsi: qedi: Remove set but unused 'page' variable
>>
>> External Email
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The variable page is set but never used throughout qedi_alloc_bdq() therefore
>> remove it.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c | 3 ---
>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c b/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c index
>> 1dec814d8788..f1c933070884 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c
>> @@ -1538,7 +1538,6 @@ static int qedi_alloc_bdq(struct qedi_ctx *qedi)
>> int i;
>> struct scsi_bd *pbl;
>> u64 *list;
>> - dma_addr_t page;
>>
>> /* Alloc dma memory for BDQ buffers */
>> for (i = 0; i < QEDI_BDQ_NUM; i++) {
>> @@ -1608,11 +1607,9 @@ static int qedi_alloc_bdq(struct qedi_ctx *qedi)
>> qedi->bdq_pbl_list_num_entries = qedi->bdq_pbl_mem_size /
>> QEDI_PAGE_SIZE;
>> list = (u64 *)qedi->bdq_pbl_list;
>> - page = qedi->bdq_pbl_list_dma;
>> for (i = 0; i < qedi->bdq_pbl_list_num_entries; i++) {
>> *list = qedi->bdq_pbl_dma;
>> list++;
>> - page += QEDI_PAGE_SIZE;
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>
> Thanks,
> Acked-by: Manish Rangankar <mrangankar@...vell.com>
Thanks for taking a look, does not that make the loop iterating the list
even more useless now, though? Should not page have been used for
something in that function?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists