[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95685711-ee3c-f1ec-4329-47e8e789a08a@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 11:43:30 +0100
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ming.lei@...hat.com, kashyap.desai@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 3/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for
shared tags
On 11/2/21 12:27 PM, John Garry wrote:
> Kashyap reports high CPU usage in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() and callees
> using megaraid SAS RAID card since moving to shared tags [0].
>
> Previously, when shared tags was shared sbitmap, this function was less
> than optimum since we would iter through all tags for all hctx's,
> yet only ever match upto tagset depth number of rqs.
>
> Since the change to shared tags, things are even less efficient if we have
> parallel callers of blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(). This is because in
> bt_iter() -> blk_mq_find_and_get_req() there would be more contention on
> accessing each request ref and tags->lock since they are now shared among
> all HW queues.
>
> Optimise by having separate calls to bt_for_each() for when we're using
> shared tags. In this case no longer pass a hctx, as it is no longer
> relevant, and teach bt_iter() about this.
>
> Ming suggested something along the lines of this change, apart from a
> different implementation.
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/e4e92abbe9d52bcba6b8cc6c91c442cc@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-tag.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists