[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sfvesktm.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:39:33 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Joel Colledge <joel.colledge@...bit.com>
Cc: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: admin-guide/blockdev: Remove digraph of
node-states
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com> writes:
> While node-states-8.dot has two digraphs, the dot(1) command can
> not properly handle multiple graphs in a DOT file and the
> kernel-doc page at
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/blockdev/drbd/figures.html
>
> fails to render the graphs.
>
> It turned out that the digraph of node_states can be removed.
>
> Quote from Joel's reflection:
>
> On reflection, the digraph node_states can be removed entirely.
> It is too basic to contain any useful information. In addition
> it references "ioctl_set_state". The ioctl configuration
> interface for DRBD has long been removed. In fact, it was never
> in the upstream version of DRBD.
>
> Remove node_states and rename the DOT file peer_states-8.dot.
>
> Suggested-by: Joel Colledge <joel.colledge@...bit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
> Cc: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
> Cc: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
Applied, thanks.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists