[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YaVljk1vLRZ/TDJ/@iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 01:43:10 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, peterhuewe@....de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests: tpm2: Reset the dictionary attack lock
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 11:10:52PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Reset the dictionary attack lock to avoid the following types of test
> failures after running the test 2 times:
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: test_unseal_with_wrong_policy (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/root/linux-ima-namespaces/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py", line 105, in test_unseal_with_wrong_policy
> blob = self.client.seal(self.root_key, data, auth, policy_dig)
> File "/root/linux-ima-namespaces/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2.py", line 620, in seal
> rsp = self.send_cmd(cmd)
> File "/root/linux-ima-namespaces/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2.py", line 397, in send_cmd
> raise ProtocolError(cc, rc)
> tpm2.ProtocolError: TPM_RC_LOCKOUT: cc=0x00000153, rc=0x00000921
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py
> index e63a37819978..ad6f54c01adf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tpm2/tpm2_tests.py
> @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ class SmokeTest(unittest.TestCase):
> except:
> self.client.flush_context(handle)
> raise
> + finally:
> + self.client.reset_da_lock()
>
> self.assertEqual(rc, tpm2.TPM2_RC_POLICY_FAIL)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
I don't agree with this as a DA lock has legit use. This would be adequate
for systems dedicated for kernel testing only.
We could make this available in the folder where TPM2 tests are:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/tpm2-scripts.git/tree/tpm2-reset-da-lock
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists