| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGETcx-oBFSueaXZ1nypzS2DE06RrC5=QM25L+FvBrizvfZxvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:44:58 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: property: stop parsing remote-endpoint graph properties
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:26 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> When parsing remote-endpoint properties, two counter devlinks will be
> created, resulting in the circular dependency, which is later broken. In
> most of the cases, the order in which depency is broken does not matter
> (or is correct). However lately I stumbled upon the following
> configuration.
>
> In this case for some reason devlink code decided to break the loop by
> making panel depend on the bridge driver, enforcing that bridge is
> probed before the panel.
Let's find and fix the "for some reason" part then instead of just
removing support for a property.
> However in such cases the bridge will lookup next bridge or panel using
> drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge() in the probe callback. Thus we have a
> deadlock: panel is waiting for the bridge because of the devlink
> dependency and bridge probe() expects the panel to be available and thus
> returns -EPROBE_DEFER.
>
> To prevent such deadlocks, stop parsing the remote-endpoint property and
> let drivers decide their probe order using standard -EPROBE_DEFER
> returns.
Nak.
Removing support for a property will always be NAKed. Not because I
care about one specific property. It's because fw_devlink needs to get
the full view of the dependencies to be able to break cycles. The
cycle detection and fixing logic has been improving steadily. So
there's no reason to give up on it suddenly.
-Saravana
>
> DTS except follows:
>
> / {
> panel0 {
> compatible = "powertip,ph800480t013-idf02";
> power-supply = <&vreg_l11c_3p3>;
> backlight = <&lcd0_reg>;
> port {
> panel0_in: endpoint {
> remote-endpoint = <&bridge0_out>;
> };
> };
> };
> };
>
> &dsi0 {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "okay";
>
> bridge@0 {
> reg = <0>;
> compatible = "toshiba,tc358762";
>
> ports {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> port@0 {
> reg = <0>;
> bridge0_in: endpoint {
> remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_out>;
> };
> };
>
> port@1 {
> reg = <1>;
> bridge0_out: endpoint {
> remote-endpoint = <&panel0_in>;
> };
> };
> };
> };
> ports {
> port@1 {
> endpoint {
> remote-endpoint = <&bridge0_in>;
> data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
> };
> };
> };
>
> };
>
> Fixes: f7514a663016 ("of: property: fw_devlink: Add support for remote-endpoint")
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/of/property.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index f7229e4030e3..83548076ee63 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -1249,7 +1249,6 @@ static struct device_node *parse_##fname(struct device_node *np, \
> * @parse_prop.index: For properties holding a list of phandles, this is the
> * index into the list
> * @optional: Describes whether a supplier is mandatory or not
> - * @node_not_dev: The consumer node containing the property is never a device.
> *
> * Returns:
> * parse_prop() return values are
> @@ -1261,7 +1260,6 @@ struct supplier_bindings {
> struct device_node *(*parse_prop)(struct device_node *np,
> const char *prop_name, int index);
> bool optional;
> - bool node_not_dev;
> };
>
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(interconnects, "interconnects", "#interconnect-cells")
> @@ -1285,7 +1283,6 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl5, "pinctrl-5", NULL)
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl6, "pinctrl-6", NULL)
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl7, "pinctrl-7", NULL)
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl8, "pinctrl-8", NULL)
> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(remote_endpoint, "remote-endpoint", NULL)
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pwms, "pwms", "#pwm-cells")
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(resets, "resets", "#reset-cells")
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(leds, "leds", NULL)
> @@ -1388,7 +1385,6 @@ static const struct supplier_bindings of_supplier_bindings[] = {
> { .parse_prop = parse_pinctrl6, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_pinctrl7, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_pinctrl8, },
> - { .parse_prop = parse_remote_endpoint, .node_not_dev = true, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_pwms, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_resets, },
> { .parse_prop = parse_leds, },
> @@ -1437,9 +1433,7 @@ static int of_link_property(struct device_node *con_np, const char *prop_name)
> while ((phandle = s->parse_prop(con_np, prop_name, i))) {
> struct device_node *con_dev_np;
>
> - con_dev_np = s->node_not_dev
> - ? of_get_compat_node(con_np)
> - : of_node_get(con_np);
> + con_dev_np = of_node_get(con_np);
> matched = true;
> i++;
> of_link_to_phandle(con_dev_np, phandle);
> --
> 2.33.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists