linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] acpi/tables: Add AEST in ACPI Table Definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25725e77-d6ba-aa33-6a1e-075f57e1b309@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:01:27 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:     "ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com" <ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com>,
        "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi/tables: Add AEST in ACPI Table Definition

On 2021/11/29 7:54, ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com wrote:
> Hi, Hanjun.
> 
> Thank you for your comment.
> We apologize for the basic mistake.
> 
> We will try to fix it as follows, is it OK?
> 
> ---
> Subject: [PATCH v3] acpi/tables: Add AEST in ACPI Table Definition
> 
> When We added AEST using the Upgrading ACPI tables via initrd function,
> the kernel could not recognize the AEST, so added the AEST table to
> the list to enable the table upgrade function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shuuichirou Ishii <ishii.shuuichir@...itsu.com>
> ---
> v3 : Changed the location of the change log so that it does not
>       disappear when the patch is applied.
> 
> v2 : The reason for committing in the commit log was not clear,
>       so it was pointed out and corrected.

Looks good to me.

Thanks
Hanjun