linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: fix error found in some cases after the patch d1af5cd86997

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YaXi803g7iv9MxWR@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:   Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:38:11 +0100
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Claudio Suarez <cssk@...-c.es>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 0day robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: fix error found in some cases after the patch
 d1af5cd86997

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:27:45PM +0100, Claudio Suarez wrote:
> The patch d1af5cd86997 ("drm: get rid of DRM_DEBUG_* log
> calls in drm core, files drm_a*.c") fails when the drm_device
> cannot be found in the parameter plane_state. Fix it.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> Fixes: d1af5cd86997 ("drm: get rid of DRM_DEBUG_* log calls in drm core, files drm_a*.c")
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Suarez <cssk@...-c.es>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 12 +++++-------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> index aef2fbd676e5..8bd4472d7949 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ update_connector_routing(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>  
>  	if (!new_connector_state->crtc) {
>  		drm_dbg_atomic(connector->dev, "Disabling [CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
> -				connector->base.id, connector->name);
> +			       connector->base.id, connector->name);

Can you pls split this checkpatch fix out?

>  
>  		set_best_encoder(state, new_connector_state, NULL);
>  
> @@ -805,6 +805,7 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
>  					bool can_update_disabled)
>  {
>  	struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->fb;
> +	struct drm_device *dev = plane_state->plane ? plane_state->plane->dev : NULL;

For real drivers plane_state->plane really should never be NULL, and
looking at the test report we blow up in an selftest. I think the right
fix here is to make the selftest more robust and also mock a drm_plane
(with a NULL plane->dev pointer, that should be fine).

Can you pls spin that and test it with the selftests enabled in the
config?

Thanks, Daniel

>  	struct drm_rect *src = &plane_state->src;
>  	struct drm_rect *dst = &plane_state->dst;
>  	unsigned int rotation = plane_state->rotation;
> @@ -828,8 +829,7 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!crtc_state->enable && !can_update_disabled) {
> -		drm_dbg_kms(plane_state->crtc->dev,
> -			       "Cannot update plane of a disabled CRTC.\n");
> +		drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Cannot update plane of a disabled CRTC.\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -839,8 +839,7 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
>  	hscale = drm_rect_calc_hscale(src, dst, min_scale, max_scale);
>  	vscale = drm_rect_calc_vscale(src, dst, min_scale, max_scale);
>  	if (hscale < 0 || vscale < 0) {
> -		drm_dbg_kms(plane_state->crtc->dev,
> -			       "Invalid scaling of plane\n");
> +		drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Invalid scaling of plane\n");
>  		drm_rect_debug_print("src: ", &plane_state->src, true);
>  		drm_rect_debug_print("dst: ", &plane_state->dst, false);
>  		return -ERANGE;
> @@ -864,8 +863,7 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	if (!can_position && !drm_rect_equals(dst, &clip)) {
> -		drm_dbg_kms(plane_state->crtc->dev,
> -			       "Plane must cover entire CRTC\n");
> +		drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Plane must cover entire CRTC\n");
>  		drm_rect_debug_print("dst: ", dst, false);
>  		drm_rect_debug_print("clip: ", &clip, false);
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -- 
> 2.33.0
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch