[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YaYFDwsw2hKdJrGj@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
wonchung@...gle.com, bleung@...omium.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] usb: Use notifier for linking Type C ports.
Hi Prashant,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:40:49AM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 03:10:06PM -0800, Prashant Malani wrote:
> > This series resolves the cyclic dependency error which was introduced by
> > commit 63cd78617350 ("usb: Link the ports to the connectors they are
> > attached to") which lead to it being reverted. The approach here is to
> > use a notifier to link a new Type C port to pre-existing USB ports
> > instead of calling an iterator of usb ports from the Type C connector
> > class. This allows commit 63cd78617350 ("usb: Link the ports to the
> > connectors they are attached to") to then be submitted without any
> > depmod cyclic dependency error.
> >
> > The final patch removes the usb port iterator since it is no longer
> > needed.
>
> This is not enough. Build the Type-C Class as a module and the USB bus
> statically, and the links will not get created.
>
> I'm not sure you actually achieve much with this series, and I'm not
> sure this approach will ever fully solve the problem. As long as we
> have to declare API, we will have the circular dependency issue on our
> hands. But there are ways to avoid that.
>
> There is for example the component framework (drivers/base/component.c)
> that I've been thinking about using here. In this case it would work
> so that you declare the USB Type-C part as your aggregate driver, and
> everything that is connected to it (so USB ports, DisplayPorts, TBT,
> etc.) would then just declare themselves as general components. Could
> you take a look at that?
I'm preparing a patch where I store all _PLDs in the ACPI tables, and
create list of devices that share it. I can convert port-mapper.c to
it and the component framework while at it.
Br,
--
heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists