lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71994534-1c56-f5b4-c054-f643c409d131@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:26:02 +0000
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: dataflash: Add device-tree SPI IDs


On 30/11/2021 11:11, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> jonathanh@...dia.com wrote on Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:53:08 +0000:
> 
>> Hi Miquel,
>>
>> On 19/11/2021 18:33, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 11:36:55 UTC, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>> Commit 5fa6863ba692 ("spi: Check we have a spi_device_id for each DT
>>>> compatible") added a test to check that every SPI driver has a
>>>> spi_device_id for each DT compatiable string defined by the driver
>>>> and warns if the spi_device_id is missing. The spi_device_ids are
>>>> missing for the dataflash driver and the following warnings are now
>>>> seen.
>>>>
>>>>    WARNING KERN SPI driver mtd_dataflash has no spi_device_id for atmel,at45
>>>>    WARNING KERN SPI driver mtd_dataflash has no spi_device_id for atmel,dataflash
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by adding the necessary spi_device_ids.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
>>>
>>> Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git mtd/next, thanks.
>>
>>
>> Please can you submit as a fix for v5.16? The commit that introduced this is already in the mainline.
> 
> Yes of course. Can you resubmit with a Fixes tag?


Thanks. I have sent a V2. I used the same Fixes tag that Mark has used 
in similar changes for consistency.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ