lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:32:03 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, tiwai@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: codecs: Qualcomm codecs fix kcontrol put return values

On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:05:03 +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Some recent testing found few issues with wcd934x and wsa881x codec drivers that
> are not handling kcontrol put correctly. This patchset fixes those instances.
> Along with this there is also a bug fix for the way channel list was updated for
> wcd934x dais.
> 
> --srini
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-linus

Thanks!

[1/4] ASoC: codecs: wcd934x: handle channel mappping list correctly
      commit: 23ba28616d3063bd4c4953598ed5e439ca891101
[2/4] ASoC: codecs: wcd934x: remove redundant ret variable
      (no commit info)
[3/4] ASoC: codecs: wcd934x: return correct value from mixer put
      commit: d9be0ff4796d1b6f5ee391c1b7e3653a43cedfab
[4/4] ASoC: codecs: wsa881x: fix return values from kcontrol put
      commit: 3fc27e9a1f619b50700f020e6cd270c1b74755f0

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ