linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: intel: boards: bytcht*: Constify static snd_soc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <163838353065.2179787.7204772157932440988.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:32:10 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: intel: boards: bytcht*: Constify static snd_soc_ops

On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 10:19:54 +0100, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> These are only assigned to the ops fields in the snd_soc_dai_link struct
> which is a pointer to const struct snd_soc_ops. Make them const to allow
> the compiler to put them in read-only memory.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: intel: boards: bytcht*: Constify static snd_soc_ops
      commit: 10b155fd413d31c89057986d0fc3d4ceef8e0e9f

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark