[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211201192043.tqed7rtwibnwhw7c@bsd-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 11:20:43 -0800
From: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC 05/12] net: optimise page get/free for bvec zc
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 03:18:53PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> get_page() in __zerocopy_sg_from_bvec() and matching put_page()s are
> expensive. However, we can avoid it if the caller can guarantee that
> pages stay alive until the corresponding ubuf_info is not released.
> In particular, it targets io_uring with fixed buffers following the
> described contract.
>
> Assuming that nobody yet uses bvec together with zerocopy, make all
> calls with bvec iterators follow this model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/skbuff.h | 10 +++++++++-
> net/core/datagram.c | 9 +++++++--
> net/core/skbuff.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 4 ++++
> 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 750b7518d6e2..ebb12a7d386d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -461,6 +461,11 @@ enum {
> SKBFL_PURE_ZEROCOPY = BIT(2),
>
> SKBFL_DONT_ORPHAN = BIT(3),
> +
> + /* page references are managed by the ubuf_info, so it's safe to
> + * use frags only up until ubuf_info is released
> + */
> + SKBFL_MANAGED_FRAGS = BIT(4),
> };
>
> #define SKBFL_ZEROCOPY_FRAG (SKBFL_ZEROCOPY_ENABLE | SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG)
> @@ -3154,7 +3159,10 @@ static inline void __skb_frag_unref(skb_frag_t *frag, bool recycle)
> */
> static inline void skb_frag_unref(struct sk_buff *skb, int f)
> {
> - __skb_frag_unref(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[f], skb->pp_recycle);
> + struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> +
> + if (!(shinfo->flags & SKBFL_MANAGED_FRAGS))
> + __skb_frag_unref(&shinfo->frags[f], skb->pp_recycle);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c
> index e00f7e0a7a0a..5cf0672039d6 100644
> --- a/net/core/datagram.c
> +++ b/net/core/datagram.c
> @@ -642,7 +642,6 @@ static int __zerocopy_sg_from_bvec(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> v = mp_bvec_iter_bvec(from->bvec, bi);
> copied += v.bv_len;
> truesize += PAGE_ALIGN(v.bv_len + v.bv_offset);
> - get_page(v.bv_page);
> skb_fill_page_desc(skb, frag++, v.bv_page, v.bv_offset, v.bv_len);
> bvec_iter_advance_single(from->bvec, &bi, v.bv_len);
> }
> @@ -671,9 +670,15 @@ int __zerocopy_sg_from_iter(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct iov_iter *from, size_t length)
> {
> int frag = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
> + bool managed = skb_shinfo(skb)->flags & SKBFL_MANAGED_FRAGS;
>
> - if (iov_iter_is_bvec(from))
> + if (iov_iter_is_bvec(from) && (managed || frag == 0)) {
> + skb_shinfo(skb)->flags |= SKBFL_MANAGED_FRAGS;
> return __zerocopy_sg_from_bvec(sk, skb, from, length);
> + }
> +
> + if (managed)
> + return -EFAULT;
>
> while (length && iov_iter_count(from)) {
> struct page *pages[MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index b23db60ea6f9..b7b087815539 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -666,10 +666,14 @@ static void skb_release_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
> &shinfo->dataref))
> goto exit;
>
> - skb_zcopy_clear(skb, true);
> + if (!(shinfo->flags & SKBFL_MANAGED_FRAGS)) {
> + for (i = 0; i < shinfo->nr_frags; i++)
> + __skb_frag_unref(&shinfo->frags[i], skb->pp_recycle);
> + } else {
> + shinfo->flags &= ~SKBFL_MANAGED_FRAGS;
> + }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < shinfo->nr_frags; i++)
> - __skb_frag_unref(&shinfo->frags[i], skb->pp_recycle);
> + skb_zcopy_clear(skb, true);
It would be better if all of this logic was moved into the callback
under zcopy_clear. Note that this path is called for both TX and RX.
--
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists