[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfTqWy_J6SgTPsWOuav8uJrNVV3wDzxB+Ned7LXipaiwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 21:28:02 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Lh Kuo 郭力豪 <lh.Kuo@...plus.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"LH.Kuo" <lhjeff911@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dvorkin@...bo.com" <dvorkin@...bo.com>,
"qinjian@...lus1.com" <qinjian@...lus1.com>,
Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] SPI: Add SPI driver for Sunplus SP7021
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:32 AM Lh Kuo 郭力豪 <lh.Kuo@...plus.com> wrote:
> > > ctlr->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> >
> > device_set_node()
>
> Is this funciton set as follows?
> device_set_node(&ctlr->dev, of_fwnode_handle(pdev->dev.fwnode));
Can you please do something?
For example, figuring out yourself (Elixir is a very good service for
that): https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/A/ident/device_set_node
...
> > > pspim->mas_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "master");
> > > pspim->sla_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev,
> > > "slave");
> >
> > Where are the error checks?
> The changes are as follows? is this correct?
Almost, but not enough. Please run checkpatch.
> pspim->mas_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "master");
> if (IS_ERR(pspim->mas_base)) {
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pspim->mas_base), "mas_base get fail\n");
> }
>
> pspim->sla_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "slave");
> if (IS_ERR(pspim->sla_base)) {
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pspim->sla_base), "sla_base get fail\n");
> }
...
> > > if (ret) {
> > > dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to deassert reset\n");
> > > goto err_free_reset;
> > > }
> >
> > These two need to be wrapped as I explained above.
>
> I think these changes are depend on remove-function.
No, it's the other way around: ->remove() implementation depends on
these changes.
> These settings are as follows? is this correct?
No.
> pspim->spi_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(pspim->spi_clk))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pspim->spi_clk), "clk get fail\n");
>
> pspim->rstc = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(pspim->rstc))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pspim->rstc), "rst get fail\n");
>
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(pspim->spi_clk);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to enable clk\n");
>
> devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, (void(*)(void *))clk_disable_unprepare,
> pspim->spi_clk);
Please, find other drivers as examples of how to do that and take care
about possible errors.
> ret = reset_control_deassert(pspim->rstc);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to deassert reset\n");
>
> devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, (void(*)(void *))reset_control_assert,
> pspim->rstc);
Ditto.
> ret = spi_register_controller(ctlr);
Read what Lukas said.
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> if (ret) {
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "spi_register_master fail\n");
> }
>
> return ret;
>
> }
>
> static int sp7021_spi_controller_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct spi_controller *ctlr = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_set_suspended(&pdev->dev);
>
> return 0;
> }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists