linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: add support for SM8450 rpmh clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ef6e0041-0e99-d169-d9af-9fa4d4ad5960@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:09:46 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@...cinc.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: add support for SM8450 rpmh clocks

On 01/12/2021 10:23, Vinod Koul wrote:
> This adds the RPMH clocks present in SM8450 SoC
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>

Tested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>

> ---
>   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> index 441d7a20e6f3..0403cff6c230 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> @@ -515,6 +515,32 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm8350 = {
>   /* Resource name must match resource id present in cmd-db */
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_ARC(sc7280, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao, "xo.lvl", 0x3, 4);
>   
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8450, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_ao, "lnbclka1", 4);
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8450, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_ao, "lnbclka2", 4);
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *sm8450_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &sc7280_bi_tcxo.hw,
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &sc7280_bi_tcxo_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK1]	= &sm8450_ln_bb_clk1.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK1_A]	= &sm8450_ln_bb_clk1_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2]	= &sm8450_ln_bb_clk2.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2_A]	= &sm8450_ln_bb_clk2_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK1]		= &sdm845_rf_clk1.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK1_A]	= &sdm845_rf_clk1_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK2]		= &sdm845_rf_clk2.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK2_A]	= &sdm845_rf_clk2_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK3]		= &sdm845_rf_clk3.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK3_A]	= &sdm845_rf_clk3_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK4]		= &sm8350_rf_clk4.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK4_A]	= &sm8350_rf_clk4_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_IPA_CLK]		= &sdm845_ipa.hw,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm8450 = {
> +	.clks = sm8450_rpmh_clocks,
> +	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8450_rpmh_clocks),
> +};
> +
>   static struct clk_hw *sc7280_rpmh_clocks[] = {
>   	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]      = &sc7280_bi_tcxo.hw,
>   	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]    = &sc7280_bi_tcxo_ao.hw,
> @@ -647,6 +673,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id clk_rpmh_match_table[] = {
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8150},
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8250},
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8350},
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8450},
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc7280},
>   	{ }
>   };
> 


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry