[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AS8PR04MB894640E4FF4EB7D01604049E8F699@AS8PR04MB8946.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 20:01:54 +0000
From: Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] soc: fsl: Replace kernel.h with the necessary
inclusions
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 3:33 AM
> To: Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] soc: fsl: Replace kernel.h with the necessary
> inclusions
>
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:41:16PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:32 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:38:01AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:24:36PM +0000, Leo Li wrote:
> > > > > > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 5:30 AM On Wed, Nov 10, 2021
> > > > > > at 12:59:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > > > v2: updated Cc list based on previous changes to MAINTAINERS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any comments on this, please?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I really want to decrease amount of kernel.h usage in the common
> headers.
> > > > > > So others won't copy'n'paste bad example.
> > > > >
> > > > > There seems to be no problem with the patch although I didn't get
> time to really compile with it applied.
> > > > >
> > > > > Will pick them up later after build test.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you!
> > > >
> > > > Note, it has two fixes against MAINTAINERS which may be sent, I
> > > > believe, sooner than later to Linus.
> > >
> > > Any new so far?
> >
> > The build test is good. I have applied it for next. Thanks.
>
> Thanks, what about MAINTAINERS updates? I don't see them neither in next
> nor in your tree.
I am ok with these MAINTAINERS updates. I thought you want to send them directly to Linus. I can take them if you like.
Regards,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists