linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] soc: fsl: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Dec 2021 23:26:34 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
Cc:     "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] soc: fsl: Replace kernel.h with the necessary
 inclusions

On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 08:01:54PM +0000, Leo Li wrote:
> > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 3:33 AM
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:41:16PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:32 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

...

> > > The build test is good.  I have applied it for next.  Thanks.
> > 
> > Thanks, what about MAINTAINERS updates? I don't see them neither in next
> > nor in your tree.
> 
> I am ok with these MAINTAINERS updates.  I thought you want to send them directly to Linus.  I can take them if you like.

I was just pointing out that it would be good that you (as a maintainer of SOC
FSL) have them applied and pushed for the current cycle, but they are not code
fixes anyway, so it's not critical.

TL;DR: Yes, please take them, thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko