[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YalSS1C4/XUzz62q@ripper>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 15:10:03 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@...eaurora.org>
Cc: robdclark@...il.com, sean@...rly.run, swboyd@...omium.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, abhinavk@...eaurora.org,
aravindh@...eaurora.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kishon@...com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] phy: qcom-qmp: add support for display port voltage
and pre-emphasis swing
On Tue 14 Sep 09:45 PDT 2021, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
$suject says "add support", but afaict the code already configures
voltage and pre-emphasis swing.
If I understand your change you're not adding support for the swing, but
rather you make it possible to have different tables for different
versions of the phy?
> Both voltage and pre-emphasis swing level are set during link training
> negotiation between host and sink. There are totally four tables added.
> A voltage swing table for both hbr and hbr1, a voltage table for both
> hbr2 and hbr3, a pre-emphasis table for both hbr and hbr1 and a pre-emphasis
> table for both hbr2 and hbr3. In addition, write 0x0a to TX_TX_POL_INV is
> added to complete the sequence of configure dp phy base on HPG.
>
> Chnages in v2:
> -- revise commit test
> -- add Fixes tag
> -- replaced voltage_swing_cfg with voltage
> -- replaced pre_emphasis_cfg with emphasis
> -- delete drv_lvl_reg and emp_post_reg parameters from qcom_qmp_v4_phy_configure_dp_swing()
> -- delete drv_lvl_reg and emp_post_reg parameters from qcom_qmp_phy_configure_dp_swing()
>
> Changes in V3:
> -- add __qcom_qmp_phy_configure_dp_swing() to commit swing/pre-emphasis level
>
> Changes in V4:
> -- pass 2D array to __qcom_qmp_phy_configure_dp_swing()
Carrying the change log as part of the commit message is a DRM specific
thing, outside of drivers/gpu this all goes below the '---' below.
>
> Fixes: aff188feb5e1 ("phy: qcom-qmp: add support for sm8250-usb3-dp phy")
It's not clear to me what issue with aff188feb5e1 this patch fixes. In
what way is aff188feb5e1 broken?
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> index 31036aa..fb029e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> @@ -3546,12 +3546,17 @@ static const u8 qmp_dp_v3_voltage_swing_hbr_rbr[4][4] = {
> { 0x1f, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
> };
>
> -static int qcom_qmp_phy_configure_dp_swing(struct qmp_phy *qphy,
> - unsigned int drv_lvl_reg, unsigned int emp_post_reg)
> +static int __qcom_qmp_phy_configure_dp_swing(struct qmp_phy *qphy,
> + unsigned int drv_lvl_reg,
> + unsigned int emp_post_reg,
> + const u8 voltage_swing_hbr_rbr[4][4],
> + const u8 pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr[4][4],
> + const u8 voltage_swing_hbr3_hbr2[4][4],
> + const u8 pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2[4][4])
> {
> const struct phy_configure_opts_dp *dp_opts = &qphy->dp_opts;
> unsigned int v_level = 0, p_level = 0;
> - u8 voltage_swing_cfg, pre_emphasis_cfg;
> + u8 voltage, emphasis;
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < dp_opts->lanes; i++) {
> @@ -3560,26 +3565,25 @@ static int qcom_qmp_phy_configure_dp_swing(struct qmp_phy *qphy,
> }
>
> if (dp_opts->link_rate <= 2700) {
> - voltage_swing_cfg = qmp_dp_v3_voltage_swing_hbr_rbr[v_level][p_level];
> - pre_emphasis_cfg = qmp_dp_v3_pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr[v_level][p_level];
> + voltage = voltage_swing_hbr_rbr[v_level][p_level];
> + emphasis = pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr[v_level][p_level];
> } else {
> - voltage_swing_cfg = qmp_dp_v3_voltage_swing_hbr3_hbr2[v_level][p_level];
> - pre_emphasis_cfg = qmp_dp_v3_pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2[v_level][p_level];
> + voltage = voltage_swing_hbr3_hbr2[v_level][p_level];
> + emphasis = pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2[v_level][p_level];
> }
>
> /* TODO: Move check to config check */
> - if (voltage_swing_cfg == 0xFF && pre_emphasis_cfg == 0xFF)
> + if (voltage == 0xFF && emphasis == 0xFF)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Enable MUX to use Cursor values from these registers */
> - voltage_swing_cfg |= DP_PHY_TXn_TX_DRV_LVL_MUX_EN;
> - pre_emphasis_cfg |= DP_PHY_TXn_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL_MUX_EN;
> -
> - writel(voltage_swing_cfg, qphy->tx + drv_lvl_reg);
> - writel(pre_emphasis_cfg, qphy->tx + emp_post_reg);
> - writel(voltage_swing_cfg, qphy->tx2 + drv_lvl_reg);
> - writel(pre_emphasis_cfg, qphy->tx2 + emp_post_reg);
> + voltage |= DP_PHY_TXn_TX_DRV_LVL_MUX_EN;
> + emphasis |= DP_PHY_TXn_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL_MUX_EN;
>
> + writel(voltage, qphy->tx + drv_lvl_reg);
> + writel(emphasis, qphy->tx + emp_post_reg);
> + writel(voltage, qphy->tx2 + drv_lvl_reg);
> + writel(emphasis, qphy->tx2 + emp_post_reg);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3588,9 +3592,13 @@ static void qcom_qmp_v3_phy_configure_dp_tx(struct qmp_phy *qphy)
> const struct phy_configure_opts_dp *dp_opts = &qphy->dp_opts;
> u32 bias_en, drvr_en;
>
> - if (qcom_qmp_phy_configure_dp_swing(qphy,
> - QSERDES_V3_TX_TX_DRV_LVL,
> - QSERDES_V3_TX_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL) < 0)
> + if (__qcom_qmp_phy_configure_dp_swing(qphy,
> + QSERDES_V3_TX_TX_DRV_LVL,
> + QSERDES_V3_TX_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL,
> + qmp_dp_v3_voltage_swing_hbr_rbr,
> + qmp_dp_v3_pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr,
> + qmp_dp_v3_voltage_swing_hbr3_hbr2,
> + qmp_dp_v3_pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2) < 0)
> return;
>
> if (dp_opts->lanes == 1) {
> @@ -3728,6 +3736,35 @@ static int qcom_qmp_v3_dp_phy_calibrate(struct qmp_phy *qphy)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* The values in these tables are given without MUX_EN (0x20) bit set */
> +static const u8 qmp_dp_v4_pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2[4][4] = {
> + { 0x00, 0x0c, 0x15, 0x1b },
> + { 0x02, 0x0e, 0x16, 0xff },
> + { 0x02, 0x11, 0xff, 0xff },
> + { 0x04, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
> +};
> +
> +static const u8 qmp_dp_v4_voltage_swing_hbr3_hbr2[4][4] = {
> + { 0x02, 0x12, 0x16, 0x1a },
> + { 0x09, 0x19, 0x1f, 0xff },
> + { 0x10, 0x1f, 0xff, 0xff },
> + { 0x1f, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
> +};
> +
> +static const u8 qmp_dp_v4_pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr[4][4] = {
> + { 0x00, 0x0e, 0x15, 0x1b },
> + { 0x00, 0x0e, 0x15, 0xff },
> + { 0x00, 0x0e, 0xff, 0xff },
> + { 0x04, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
> +};
> +
> +static const u8 qmp_dp_v4_voltage_swing_hbr_rbr[4][4] = {
> + { 0x08, 0x0f, 0x16, 0x1f },
> + { 0x11, 0x1e, 0x1f, 0xff },
> + { 0x16, 0x1f, 0xff, 0xff },
> + { 0x1f, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
> +};
> +
> static void qcom_qmp_v4_phy_dp_aux_init(struct qmp_phy *qphy)
> {
> writel(DP_PHY_PD_CTL_PWRDN | DP_PHY_PD_CTL_PSR_PWRDN | DP_PHY_PD_CTL_AUX_PWRDN |
> @@ -3757,16 +3794,13 @@ static void qcom_qmp_v4_phy_dp_aux_init(struct qmp_phy *qphy)
>
> static void qcom_qmp_v4_phy_configure_dp_tx(struct qmp_phy *qphy)
> {
> - /* Program default values before writing proper values */
> - writel(0x27, qphy->tx + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_DRV_LVL);
> - writel(0x27, qphy->tx2 + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_DRV_LVL);
> -
> - writel(0x20, qphy->tx + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL);
> - writel(0x20, qphy->tx2 + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL);
> -
> - qcom_qmp_phy_configure_dp_swing(qphy,
> + __qcom_qmp_phy_configure_dp_swing(qphy,
> QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_DRV_LVL,
> - QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL);
> + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL,
> + qmp_dp_v4_voltage_swing_hbr_rbr,
> + qmp_dp_v4_pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr,
> + qmp_dp_v4_voltage_swing_hbr3_hbr2,
> + qmp_dp_v4_pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2);
> }
>
> static int qcom_qmp_v4_phy_configure_dp_phy(struct qmp_phy *qphy)
> @@ -3885,6 +3919,9 @@ static int qcom_qmp_v4_phy_configure_dp_phy(struct qmp_phy *qphy)
> writel(drvr1_en, qphy->tx2 + QSERDES_V4_TX_HIGHZ_DRVR_EN);
> writel(bias1_en, qphy->tx2 + QSERDES_V4_TX_TRANSCEIVER_BIAS_EN);
>
> + writel(0x0a, qphy->tx + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_POL_INV);
> + writel(0x0a, qphy->tx2 + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_POL_INV);
So specifying TX_POL_INV has do be done before we kick off the
configuration? This sounds like a real bug fix, separate of the swing
settings.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something with this change?
Thanks,
Bjorn
> +
> writel(0x18, qphy->pcs + QSERDES_DP_PHY_CFG);
> udelay(2000);
> writel(0x19, qphy->pcs + QSERDES_DP_PHY_CFG);
> @@ -3896,11 +3933,9 @@ static int qcom_qmp_v4_phy_configure_dp_phy(struct qmp_phy *qphy)
> 10000))
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> - writel(0x0a, qphy->tx + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_POL_INV);
> - writel(0x0a, qphy->tx2 + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_POL_INV);
>
> - writel(0x27, qphy->tx + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_DRV_LVL);
> - writel(0x27, qphy->tx2 + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_DRV_LVL);
> + writel(0x22, qphy->tx + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_DRV_LVL);
> + writel(0x22, qphy->tx2 + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_DRV_LVL);
>
> writel(0x20, qphy->tx + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL);
> writel(0x20, qphy->tx2 + QSERDES_V4_TX_TX_EMP_POST1_LVL);
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists